PoppingPopper
PoppingPopper3y ago

setInterval without destroying it to update state?

I have a perdicament where I want to update state on an interval. Every way that I go about it I find myself being forced to use the dependency array of the useEffect for the setInterval so I can get updated state values. This causes my interval to just be destroyed and rebuilt every interval because of state changing on the interval. How can I achieve this interval without ever having to destroy it to listen to state changes?
const [incrementCount, setIncrementCount] = useState(1);
const [translationX, setTranslationX] = useState([...INIT_TRANSLATION_X]);

const incrementTranslationX = useCallback(() => {
if (incrementCount && incrementCount % 2 === 0) { //* the condition
setIncrementCount(0);
setTranslationX([...INIT_TRANSLATION_X]);
} else {
setIncrementCount((prev) => prev + 1);
setTranslationX((prev) => [prev[0] + INCREMENT, prev[1] + INCREMENT]);
}
}, [incrementCount, translationX]);

//loop interval
useEffect(() => {
const interval = setInterval(() => {
incrementTranslationX();
}, INTERVAL);

return () => {
clearInterval(interval);
console.log("DESTROYED INTERVAL");
};
}, [incrementTranslationX]); //! cannot update (the condition) without this
const [incrementCount, setIncrementCount] = useState(1);
const [translationX, setTranslationX] = useState([...INIT_TRANSLATION_X]);

const incrementTranslationX = useCallback(() => {
if (incrementCount && incrementCount % 2 === 0) { //* the condition
setIncrementCount(0);
setTranslationX([...INIT_TRANSLATION_X]);
} else {
setIncrementCount((prev) => prev + 1);
setTranslationX((prev) => [prev[0] + INCREMENT, prev[1] + INCREMENT]);
}
}, [incrementCount, translationX]);

//loop interval
useEffect(() => {
const interval = setInterval(() => {
incrementTranslationX();
}, INTERVAL);

return () => {
clearInterval(interval);
console.log("DESTROYED INTERVAL");
};
}, [incrementTranslationX]); //! cannot update (the condition) without this
Solution:
Looks like the answer I'm looking for is to not read state at all and instead use local values.
Jump to solution
2 Replies
Solution
PoppingPopper
PoppingPopper3y ago
Looks like the answer I'm looking for is to not read state at all and instead use local values.
aprillion
aprillion3y ago
or read someRef.current from inside an interval